The applicant was seeking relief against the respondents for his house arrest. The applicant was arrested and detained during the state of emergency, later released and kept under house arrest. The application was dismissed and each party was directed to pay its own costs.

The applicant, a university student was appealing against the judgment delivered by the Magistrate. The applicant was arrested for trespass when asked to leave the police station. The magistrate held that the applicant failed to prove his case on a balance of probabilities and dismissed his claim with costs. The appeal was allowed with costs.

The applicant was seeking a relief against the respondents. The applicant is an adult male attorney employed by the Legal Resources Centre, detained by the police for not having a permit to be in KwaNdebele. The respondents apologised and agreed to pay the applicant R25 000-00 (Twenty five thousand rands).

The applicant who is an adult male delivery assistant was assaulted by the four members of the South African Defence Force. As a result of the assault, the applicant sustained injuries and lost the sight of his left eye. The applicant was suing Minister of Defence for an amount of R52 540 — 00. The respondent was held liable for the injuries and ordered to pay the applicant.

This a case against the respondents who are officers in charge of a squad of members of the police. The respondents are aged 37 years and 33 years old and accused of unlawfully and willfully instructing the members of their police squad to assaulting members of the public who were protesting. The respondents were found not criminally liable for their actions and the case was dismissed.

This is an application for an order against second and third respondents, interdicting and restraining them from assaulting, harassing, intimidating any employee of the first applicant. The applicants are the managers and owners of the Victoria and Alfred Waterfront. The application was successful.